[rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules
jhildebr at cisco.com
Wed May 9 09:03:37 PDT 2012
On 5/9/12 6:57 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right?
> I am not sure quite what you mean there.
A really good example I've heard is "I want to pull out all of the ABNF and
run it through a separate tool to ensure it is correct". Imagine similar
markup for ASN.1 descriptions, etc.
Metadata doesn't mean just author and publish date.
More information about the rfc-interest