[rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Wed May 9 07:06:17 PDT 2012


On 9 May 2012, at 15:55 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> * Ten of the top twenty most commonly downloaded RFCs should be made
> available in both formats to see whether this increases the number of
> accesses.

This is immaterial. RFCs can be made available in all formats that are sufficiently popular to warrant the conversion effort. (ePub, please.) What's important is the master format that needs roundtrip abilities and longevity.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list