[rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed May 9 05:09:21 PDT 2012


On 2012-05-09 13:12, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> I note that as is often the case when the blatantly obvious is said we
> have disagreement by unresolved reference.
>
> If you can't give a reason for a disagreement then you should probably
> think a bit before posting and wait until you can state what the
> disagreement is.
>
> We have two standards bodies here. What is the reason to NOT have a
> common standard?
>
>
> BTW the only 'tools' I needed to produce W3C docs was the bit of code
> to rip out the style crud produced by Microsoft Word and another that
> produced the index.
>
> I used the same tools to produce W3C and OASIS docs.

...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right?



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list