[rfc-i] quick talk slides
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Mar 27 06:53:16 PDT 2012
On 3/27/2012 1:34 PM, Patrick Linskey (plinskey) wrote:
> I've heard that cryptographic signing of artifacts is an important part of the process as well. Is that something we should be adding to the use cases you outlined, or do you envision that being handled separately?
The discussion will probably benefit from distinguishing between features whose
lack is already causing serious problems, versus features that would be (quite)
nice to have.
More information about the rfc-interest