[rfc-i] quick talk slides

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Mar 27 06:53:16 PDT 2012



On 3/27/2012 1:34 PM, Patrick Linskey (plinskey) wrote:
> I've heard that cryptographic signing of artifacts is an important part of the process as well. Is that something we should be adding to the use cases you outlined, or do you envision that being handled separately?


The discussion will probably benefit from distinguishing between features whose 
lack is already causing serious problems, versus features that would be (quite) 
nice to have.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list