[rfc-i] transition plan for choosing alternative format for RFCs

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Mon Mar 26 09:14:46 PDT 2012


I am not aware of any PDF reader for mobile devices that comes remotely
close to the usability of any of the browsers with HTML.
On Mar 26, 2012 6:05 AM, "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth at adobe.com> wrote:

> >So what's a PDF viewer you would recommend, for, for instance, Android
> >2.3?
> >
> What are you functional requirements?
>
> Adobe Reader Mobile, for example, works with Android 2.3 and supports both
> static as well as reflow views for PDFs.  It is also free :).
>
> Leonard
>
>
> On 3/26/12 12:37 PM, "julian.reschke at gmx.de" <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
> >On 2012-03-26 11:52, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> >>  >PDF offers very poor readability on, for example, the Samsung Galaxy
> >> Nexus I'm using to type this email.
> >>  >
> >> No, PDF has nothing to do with that.
> >>
> >> The choice of VIEWER that you are using is given you a bad experience
> >> with that document.
> >>
> >> Don't blame the format for the failings of the viewerŠ
> >> ...
> >
> >So what's a PDF viewer you would recommend, for, for instance, Android
> >2.3?
> >
> >Best regards, Julian
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20120326/9ffc945a/attachment.htm>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list