[rfc-i] more requirements

Patrick Linskey (plinskey) plinskey at cisco.com
Mon Mar 26 06:28:07 PDT 2012

I wrote:

> I'm joining the party late here, but my assumption from these threads
> is that the goals of a new format include:
> - human-editable
> - easily machine-readable, including semantic awareness (implies
> transformable)
> - single-file archive format
> - Unicode support
> - suitable for revision control systems

Here's another one that came up on another thread earlier today:

- Canonical stable locations for final output, so that other RFCs and
third parties can link to documents at least, and ideally also sections,
figures, etc.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list