[rfc-i] Potential RFC format approach: HTML

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Sun Mar 25 23:51:35 PDT 2012

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:42 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
<duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
> I agree with Joe that it should be <strong> and not <b>
> where we have a choice.

No. Just stick with <em>.  One level of emphasis is more than enough;
any time you use even one represents a failure of your ability to use
words to get the message across that “this is especially important”.
Having said that, judicious use of <em> can be a plus. But stop there.

> Regards,   Martin.
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list