[rfc-i] Potential RFC format approach: HTML

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Sun Mar 25 23:42:03 PDT 2012


On 2012/03/25 3:41, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-03-24 15:32, Joe Hildebrand wrote:

>> I was thinking of stuff on the way out, like blink, and using strong
>> instead
>> b.
>
> <blink> never was in any HTML spec, I think. <strong> may be
> non-conforming in HTML5, but will continue to work. Trust me.

Strong is part of HTML5, no problem. Please see 
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-strong-element 
or something similar. I agree with Joe that it should be <strong> and 
not <b> where we have a choice.

Regards,   Martin.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list