[rfc-i] rfc-interest Digest, Vol 89, Issue 11
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Sun Mar 25 02:06:25 PDT 2012
On 2012-03-25 07:57, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 3/22/2012 8:06 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> The current publication format is text/plain, encoded in US-ASCII.
>> We can change the media type without changing the encoding, such as by
>> moving to
>> "text/plain; format=flowed".
>> We can change the encoding without changing the media type, such as by
>> moving to
>> "text/plain", encoded in UTF-8.
> (Take the refinements noted in a couple of later messages as given.)
> So, I'm looking at your two variations, here, and find myself wondering
> why they are not sufficient enhancements for the needs of RFCs, in terms
> of adapting to different display environments and supporting
> international character sets?
> These are the smallest possible tweaks to our current system and seem to
> entirely handle the major issues of display variability and
> international character sets.
> It doesn't handle embedded images, of course, but for the rest, I'm
> curious why the above are not sufficient?
Note that I mentioned format=flowed because it would make it at least
possible to reflow what should be reflowable (assuming we throw away
That being said; it was more of a theoretical point, unless browser
makers start implementing this.
More information about the rfc-interest