[rfc-i] Potential RFC format approach: HTML

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Sat Mar 24 12:18:15 PDT 2012

On Mar 24, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:

> On 3/24/12 8:55 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> Regarding writing tools -
>> IMO if that's a key part of the solution, it's not viable.
>> We can't be that unique in our needs that we can't use commercial tools.
> Although I don't fully agree with this, I don't mind having that as a
> requirement.  Therefore, our choices are Word or HTML.

Word is both an editing program and a set of formats; as an editor it supports the current txt format. This is why I broke the probes into phases - word is not the archive format, but an output that requires we create out own editors should be avoided.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list