[rfc-i] Potential RFC format approach: HTML
touch at isi.edu
Sat Mar 24 12:18:15 PDT 2012
On Mar 24, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:
> On 3/24/12 8:55 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> Regarding writing tools -
>> IMO if that's a key part of the solution, it's not viable.
>> We can't be that unique in our needs that we can't use commercial tools.
> Although I don't fully agree with this, I don't mind having that as a
> requirement. Therefore, our choices are Word or HTML.
Word is both an editing program and a set of formats; as an editor it supports the current txt format. This is why I broke the probes into phases - word is not the archive format, but an output that requires we create out own editors should be avoided.
More information about the rfc-interest