[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-04.txt -3.1 & 4.3
Joel M. Halpern
jmh at joelhalpern.com
Tue Mar 13 11:12:53 PDT 2012
Thanks SM. That is helpful. That helps me understand what you wanted,
and should help end up with better wording.
On 3/13/2012 12:02 PM, SM wrote:
>> The sentence makes somewhat more sense (although i can well believe it
>> could use editing) in context. The context is the section about
>> disputes. The RSE is being given explicit authority to keep the
>> trains running on time, and to get enough information to know whether
>> there are bigger issues, even if that requires making some unilateral
>> decisions. Without this text, and with the unfortuantly capable
>> imagination of the commentors, it was possible to envision situations
>> where the whole RFC Editor process could be driven to a halt. And
>> that was unacceptable.
> Ok. I'll suggest text:
> The RSE may make final decisions unilaterally only to assure the
> functioning of the process; and while there is an evaluation of
> current policies to determine whether they are appropriately
> implemented or need adjustment.
> I am not sure whether I captured the intent correctly.
More information about the rfc-interest