[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-04.txt
sm at resistor.net
Mon Mar 12 22:48:56 PDT 2012
At 19:48 12-03-2012, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>It is left waffly because, as an IAB program and an IAB
>responsibility, the IAB needs to retain flexibility with regard to
>its direct participation in the RSOC, rather than trying to write
>prescriptive rules about it.
In Section 4.1, there is:
"The RSOC shall develop and publish its own rules of order."
Has those rules been developed or is this tied to the publication of
As a nit, in Section 2.1.5, please expand "FTE".
In Section 3.1:
"The RSOC was expected to describe the process it ultimately
selected to the community and did involve the community in
interim considerations when that was likely to be of value."
I don't understand the sentence.
"Following completion of the selection process, the RSOC will
determine the best way to share information learned and experience
gained with the community and to determine how to best preserve that
information for future use."
Is it important to have the above in this draft?
In Section 4.3:
"The RSE may make final decisions unilaterally only to assure the
functioning of the process and evaluation of whether current policies
are appropriately implemented in the decision or need adjustment."
I have some difficulty parsing the above sentence.
In Section 4.4, there is a typo: "it's".
P.S. The IAB may wish to update its RFC Editor Program web page to
reflect the actual composition of the RSOC.
More information about the rfc-interest