June 2012 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Jun 1 04:36:02 PDT 2012
Ending: Fri Jun 29 08:52:12 PDT 2012
Messages: 269

• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] A proposal: HTML   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] verifying where we do/don't have consensus   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Representation flexibility   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Tim Bray
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Tim Bray
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Tim Bray
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Tim Bray
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] How "modern" word processors do it   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Brian E Carpenter
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   "Martin J. Dürst"
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   "Martin J. Dürst"
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   "Martin J. Dürst"
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   "Martin J. Dürst"
• [rfc-i] Fwd: Shared references service   "Martin J. Dürst"
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• [rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data   Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] Towards 'canonicalization' consensus   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Joel M. Halpern
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Joel M. Halpern
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Joel M. Halpern
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Joel M. Halpern
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Hildebrand
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Fwd: RFC 6635 on RFC Editor Model (Version 2)   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Paul Hoffman
• [rfc-i] only sort of about issue: canonical formats   Ole Jacobsen
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] only sort of about issue: canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John Levine
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   John Levine
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   John Levine
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   John Levine
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   John Levine
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   John R Levine
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   Andrew G. Malis
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Andrew G. Malis
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Andrew G. Malis
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Yoav Nir
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Colin Perkins
• [rfc-i] issue: legal status of canonical formats   Colin Perkins
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Representation flexibility   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Julian Reschke
• [rfc-i] How "modern" word processors do it   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] ISBN and DOI   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] verifying where we do/don't have consensus   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Martin Rex
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Leonard Rosenthol
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Leonard Rosenthol
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Leonard Rosenthol
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   SM
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   SM
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   SM
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   SM
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   SM
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Peter Saint-Andre
• [rfc-i] RFC-on-phone: a sighting   Peter Saint-Andre
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Peter Saint-Andre
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Peter Saint-Andre
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Andrew Sullivan
• [rfc-i] open issues: small and mobile screens   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Big Picture and RFC format   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] issue: canonical formats   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Representation flexibility   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Joe Touch
• [rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?   Joe Touch

Last message date: Fri Jun 29 08:52:12 PDT 2012
Archived on: Fri Jun 29 08:51:19 PDT 2012

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...