[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

[Iljitsch van Beijnum]

On 22 Jun 2012, at 16:07 , John R Levine wrote:

>>> I've now asked several times for an example of a way that an xml2rfc document might be broken, and the problem wouldn't be evident in the html or text versions, with no replies at all.

>> none of which has anything to do with the question I asked ]

Can you improve the question such that it becomes possible to answer it in a way that doesn't make you sigh? As it is the question is extremely vague.