[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

John R Levine johnl at taugh.com
Fri Jun 22 07:07:34 PDT 2012

>> I've now asked several times for an example of a way that an xml2rfc 
>> document might be broken, and the problem wouldn't be evident in the 
>> html or text versions, with no replies at all.

> When I started using XML2RFC some years ago [ a long discussion of why 
> he dislikes xml2rfc, none of which has anything to do with the question 
> I asked ]


John Levine, johnl at taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list