[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jun 21 13:47:13 PDT 2012
On 2012-06-21 22:43, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2012, at 22:14 , John Levine wrote:
>> I submit all my drafts in xml2rfc, I
>> proof the html and occasionally the txt version. I'm having trouble
>> coming up with a plausible scenario in which there would be a problem
>> with the xml2rfc that wouldn't be apparent in the html and the txt.
> What do you do when for some reason XML2RFC fails to run?
Right now there are three different and independent implementations of
rfc2629-xml-to-html converters already. (at least)
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest