[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

[Julian Reschke]

On 2012-06-21 22:43, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2012, at 22:14 , John Levine wrote:
>
>> I submit all my drafts in xml2rfc, I
>> proof the html and occasionally the txt version.  I'm having trouble
>> coming up with a plausible scenario in which there would be a problem
>> with the xml2rfc that wouldn't be apparent in the html and the txt.
>
> What do you do when for some reason XML2RFC fails to run?

Right now there are three different and independent implementations of 
rfc2629-xml-to-html converters already. (at least)

Best regards, Julian