[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

[Iljitsch van Beijnum]

On 21 Jun 2012, at 22:14 , John Levine wrote:

> I submit all my drafts in xml2rfc, I
> proof the html and occasionally the txt version.  I'm having trouble
> coming up with a plausible scenario in which there would be a problem
> with the xml2rfc that wouldn't be apparent in the html and the txt.

What do you do when for some reason XML2RFC fails to run?