[rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Jun 21 13:23:58 PDT 2012


On 20 Jun 2012, at 17:25 , Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:

> I am expecting that there will be additional tools for
> converting the RFC in to several different formats.  I am not decided on
> whether those conversions should happen from the source files or the
> canonical file.  I'm thinking the former would be more flexible?

Under that regime there would be less information in the canonical version than in the source version. Why remove information once it's there? Or, why add information to the source if it's not going to get used?



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list