[rfc-i] Open issue: semantically tagging data

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Jun 21 11:42:14 PDT 2012


On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:58:47AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> It should a requirement for the canonical document that will be used
> to generate the other documents.

I refuse to state a position about this matter, but I want to make
explicit that the above more or less entails that the "canonical
document" be source code over which a transformation is run.  That
probably entails that nobody normal will be able to read the canonical
form.

Best,

A


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list