[rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"

[Paul Hoffman]

On Jun 20, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:

> Indeed, I am expecting that there will be additional tools for
> converting the RFC in to several different formats.  I am not decided on
> whether those conversions should happen from the source files or the
> canonical file.  I'm thinking the former would be more flexible?


Not being pedantic, but what exactly do you mean by "the source file"?

--Paul Hoffman