[rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Wed Jun 20 08:29:19 PDT 2012
On Jun 20, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> Indeed, I am expecting that there will be additional tools for
> converting the RFC in to several different formats. I am not decided on
> whether those conversions should happen from the source files or the
> canonical file. I'm thinking the former would be more flexible?
Not being pedantic, but what exactly do you mean by "the source file"?
More information about the rfc-interest