[rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"

John Levine johnl at taugh.com
Sun Jun 17 12:36:08 PDT 2012

>Sorry for being dense, but I'm still not seeing it. How would a text file not be
>"durable and readable" for several centuries? What other type of file do you see
>as being more "durable and readable"?

Bar codes printed on parchment?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list