[rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Sat Jun 16 10:51:34 PDT 2012

On Jun 16, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Joe Touch wrote:

> I also think that editing software isn't something I expect the RFC Editor - or anyone else - to supply. Maybe post-processors, but not the editing system. If we can't use what the majority of the planet uses to write our docs, then something's busted.

Ummm, how do you think that the hundreds (if not thousands) if Internet-Draft authors are producing XML today? Hint: with text editors.

--Paul Hoffman

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list