[rfc-i] New proposal for "canonical and others"

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Jun 15 19:28:29 PDT 2012

On 6/15/12 4:21 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. I was surprised by the amount of interest people
> here had for having the canonical format for RFCs be XML or HTML. 

Input format, output format, "archival" format, or something else?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list