[rfc-i] issue: canonical formats

John Levine johnl at taugh.com
Wed Jun 6 03:06:11 PDT 2012

>Right. But in case of technical ambiguity, it will be the signed-off
>version that wins, so we'd better do the utmost to avoid ambiguity.

Do you really think that courts are so stupid that they would insist
on using the content-free "canonical" text version of RFC 1131 rather
than the Postscript or PDF?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list