[rfc-i] issue: canonical formats

John Levine johnl at taugh.com
Wed Jun 6 03:01:47 PDT 2012


>But that's just the problem. If there's a PDF version and an ASCII
>version (just to refer to today's reality) and there is a technical
>difference between the two (originally caused by human error),
>which one counts, ten years later in court?

The original xml2rfc, of course.

R's,
John


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list