[rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Jun 5 01:19:17 PDT 2012
On 2012-06-05 10:15, Martin Rex wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> But being fast doesn't mean it's simple to maintain references when
>> sections are renumbered.
>> Again: even if the authors does everything right, you just shift the
>> work to the paid (!) team of the RFC production center. I don't think
>> that's a good idea.
> Section renumbering by the RFC Editor should be easily and completely
> avoidable by some minor planning ahead, and this would save the
> RFC Editor even more work.
If section numbers aren't generated than you force reviewers and
production center to check. Even if you *do* get them all right it's
simply a big waste of time.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest