[rfc-i] issue: canonical formats
Andrew G. Malis
agmalis at gmail.com
Sun Jun 3 04:33:53 PDT 2012
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:
>> this other part is the second author's postal code.
> Why not include the author's latitude and longitude rather than trying to attach meaning to postal codes?
You weren't serious, were you? The author's contact information is
just that - how to contact them. You can't contact anyone via their
latitude and longitude, but you can via their postal address.
More information about the rfc-interest