[rfc-i] issue: canonical formats

Joe Hildebrand jhildebr at cisco.com
Fri Jun 1 11:40:38 PDT 2012


On 6/1/12 11:33 AM, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:

> This thread is a proposal to change the requirements list to not have a
> canonical display format. If a court says "give us an exact copy of RFC 9886",
> we send them the canonical document. If they ask "what does this look like",
> we say "it looks like many things, such as these different versions". Both are
> completely truthful and actually useful to a court.

As long as all of the formats contain the same information, I don't actually
care about having a canonical format.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list