dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Jul 31 13:24:36 PDT 2012
On 7/31/2012 1:14 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> Other than the table-ness, everything else is easy to
> recreate with the exact HTML we have in my proposal, modifying solely the
> CSS. Hence, the table-ness is the "interesting" part from an
> implementation perspective. I don't know how important that is to you.
table-ness is an implementation detail. (i like table-ess a la html and
even xml2rfc.) but my point was purely about the aesthetics. that your
system can easily change the appearance wasn't my concern. getting a
'good' appearance is.
frankly i took it as a given that it would be easy to encode the
template, as soon as we figure out what it should look like.
> Regardless, I think we should take this as an opportunity to create a new
> brand, so recreating the brand of docs that we don't currently publish
> officially doesn't feel like a high priority to me.
I wasn't trying to press that hard for it, as much as noting that it's
something to attend to explicitly... eventually.
More information about the rfc-interest