[rfc-i] Byte Order Marks for UTF-8

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Wed Jul 18 08:20:39 PDT 2012


On Jul 18, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> I think the tools need to accept a BOM but not require one.

We aren't talking about "the tools" (or, we shouldn't be): we are talking about the publication format.

We should test published formats with and without a BOM and see which causes more good, and more bad, results.

--Paul Hoffman



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list