[rfc-i] Byte Order Marks for UTF-8

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Wed Jul 18 08:01:08 PDT 2012


On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:

> I'm reluctant for now to add a BOM, because that might give some hick-ups to some kind of processing.

Given that some people said "this works fine if there is a BOM", I think that experimenting with BOMs is actually worthwhile.

--Paul Hoffman


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list