julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jul 12 08:37:36 PDT 2012
On 2012-07-12 17:32, Joe Touch wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2012-07-12 17:06, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> However, whatever tags are *required* (and we still don't have that list), they need to be the MINIMAL such list.
>> And where is *that* requirement coming from?
> It's a direct consequence of the primary requirement that the solution be archival.
I don't see how that follows from the archival requirement.
> (it's disappointingly unsurprising that I need to point this out)
Well. I'm also frequently disappointed about how ofter I have to
re-explain things over here.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest