[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

[Iljitsch van Beijnum]

On 10 Jul 2012, at 17:32 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> At this point I would like us to get to closure on the basic idea of
> moving to an XML based workflow with (unspecified) attachments within
> the RFC editor's domain first because that is something I think we are
> almost all agreed on.

I guess that happens when I don't read my mail for a few days. Please put me down for a big -1 on that XML thing.