[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

[Julian Reschke]

On 2012-07-10 15:39, Yoav Nir wrote:
> ...
> The other problem that keeps coming up is people wanting to add images, graphs and formulas to documents. XML2RFC as it currently stands is just as ill-suited for this as nroff.
> ...

xml2rfc, when producing HTML, manages inclusion of graphics quite well 
already.

Formulas (if falling back to graphics isn't acceptable) are indeed not 
covered.

Best regards, Julian