[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Jul 10 06:50:13 PDT 2012
On 2012-07-10 15:39, Yoav Nir wrote:
> The other problem that keeps coming up is people wanting to add images, graphs and formulas to documents. XML2RFC as it currently stands is just as ill-suited for this as nroff.
xml2rfc, when producing HTML, manages inclusion of graphics quite well
Formulas (if falling back to graphics isn't acceptable) are indeed not
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest