[rfc-i] Making life easy for authors/editors

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Sat Jul 7 11:52:31 PDT 2012


Does it have an output mode that will work for small screens?
-T
On Jul 7, 2012 7:44 AM, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been reading the recent discussions with interest, but haven't
> seen a particular issue addressed, as least recently. As a draft and
> RFC author/editor (and WG chair), my primary interest isn't in how
> drafts and RFCs are stored for posterity, but rather how they're
> generated. I currently use NroffEdit to write drafts, because it's
> easy. Even though years ago I could generate raw nroff with the best
> of them, that's not my interest - I just want to write the words and
> not have to program the metalanguage. NroffEdit makes that very easy -
> it's a WYSIWYG editor that generates the nroff for me. Just give me a
> tool that easy, and I don't really care what metalanguage it generates
> and is used by the RFC Editor.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20120707/7fb6fd23/attachment.htm>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list