[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Jul 6 23:38:50 PDT 2012
On 2012-07-06 23:31, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 7/6/2012 5:56 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>> On 07/06/2012 02:41 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
>>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> On 2012-07-06 01:44, Martin Rex wrote:
>>>>> Moving away from plain ASCII is magnitudes easier than moving away
>>>>> XML, which is why ASCII is a pretty good choice in the first place.
>>>> If moving away from plain ASCII was "easy", it would have happened
>> In this millenium I don't think that any RFC had been written
>> directly in ASCII only with a simple editor as tool.
> See RFC5385. We've discussed its use in ths thready.
? It was written in Word, no?
More information about the rfc-interest