[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Jul 6 23:27:59 PDT 2012
On 2012-07-06 23:36, Joe Touch wrote:
>> The point I was trying to make is that just because "constrained HTML"
>> is HTML that doesn't mean that you can use an off-the-shelf HTML editor,
>> without further processing. At which point the difference to xml2rfc
>> isn't that big anymore.
> It is - xml-based requires an XML editor, or editing source. At least a
> few of us would like to be able to use a modern editor without editing
> source - even if it requires a post-processing step for submission.
Not true. Once you do need an additional processing step, you can have
that step xml2rfc source as well.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest