[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?
mrex at sap.com
Fri Jul 6 05:41:35 PDT 2012
Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-07-06 01:44, Martin Rex wrote:
> > ...
> > Moving away from plain ASCII is magnitudes easier than moving away from
> > XML, which is why ASCII is a pretty good choice in the first place.
> > ...
> If moving away from plain ASCII was "easy", it would have happened already.
rfcmarkup, which produces one HTMLized version of ASCII TXT RFCs and IDs
accessible under http://tools.ietf.org/html/
did not need months of mailing list discussions to come into existence,
and did not require I-D authors to dump their existing authoring tools.
More information about the rfc-interest