[rfc-i] A wild thought, RE: Valid email addresses [last call "On Authors, Contributors, Editors, and overload."]
rcallon at juniper.net
Thu Jan 12 09:19:16 PST 2012
It might help some if there is just some public statement that when authors find that their email address (as listed in an Internet Draft or RFC) is going to change, that they be requested to tell the RFC editor what the new email address will be (and the process to do so, which is presumably to send email to someone or something).
If this causes 1/2 of all authors to actually tell the RFC editor what their updated address is, and if the RFC editor staff keeps track of this information, then this could at least cut the "try to find a missing author" problem in half.
From: rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org [mailto:rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:45 AM
To: John Levine
Cc: rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] A wild thought, RE: Valid email addresses [last call "On Authors, Contributors, Editors, and overload."]
On 1/11/2012 11:59 PM, John Levine wrote:
> Funny you should mention that. Just this week, the guy working on 2369bis
> said he wasn't able to find the authors of 2369, because neither of the
> addresses in the RFC work any more.
The premise is that having the role address would fix the issue, but of course,
the second half of this is requiring the owners of the addresses to keep the
forwarding entry up to date.
We are talking about something that is relatively rarely used, for most folk,
and therefore less likely to be remembered.
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest