[rfc-i] last call "On Authors, Contributors, Editors, and overload."

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Tue Jan 10 12:42:32 PST 2012


On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:11:30PM -0800, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>  I agree here.  The set of people for whom employer-perceived
> prestige from getting its name at the top of an RFC is probably
> non-zero, which means their participation might be hampered by this
> change.  There will be a bit of cost associated with it if we
> proceed.

Well, given that people seem mostly concerned with the burgeoning
numbers of authors, I thought that cost was part of the benefit here!
But I agree it'd need discussion on the general IETF list.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list