[rfc-i] last call "On Authors, Contributors, Editors, and overload."
sm at resistor.net
Tue Jan 10 09:52:39 PST 2012
At 04:50 10-01-2012, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>This past autumn, a discussion started regarding the need to clarify
>terms and responsibilities for Authors, Contributing Authors, Editors,
>and Contributors (see
>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.rfc.interest/2395 for the original
>discussion). Olaf drafted a policy statement, collected feedback, and
There is also a mailing list archive at
>Final substantive comments are welcome through 17-Jan-2012.
> * AUTHORS or EDITORS
> The designation AUTHOR or EDITOR is one that is made by the
> individuals themselves.
This is stream dependent. For a WG draft, it would be up to the WG
chair. As the AD and IESG also have their say, I would use the
wording provided by Paul Hoffman.
> If an EDITOR is also a contributing author, her name may appear in
> the Contributing Authors section as well, without the 'editor'
Isn't that a bit too much? I suggest removing this to keep matters simple.
>During the discussion of this policy Joe Touch provided
>* Acknowledgments are to provide credit to those who gave feedback, or
> for specific ideas - for those who did not contribute extended text.
>* Contributors are to provide credit for those who contribute extended
> text, as is often the case with large FAQs or BCPs.
>* Contributing Authors is a cookie to those who were left off the
> Author list due to a process issue.
Fred Baker provided good advice (
More information about the rfc-interest