[rfc-i] RFC format: any discussions at the Paris IETF?
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Feb 27 01:45:19 PST 2012
On 2012-02-27 02:29, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 2/26/2012 4:48 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>>> FWIW, won't be there but it might be worth discussing the editing
>>> tools that are supported.
>>> E.g., I use MS Word to write RFCs (See RFC 5385), which for me is
>>> hugely more efficient than XML.
>> I think we all agree that whatever the canonical format is, we'll want
>> tools to translate from whatever editors people like, but it's worth
> FWIW, my point is that a form that doesn't have a WYSIWYG editor is,
> IMO, DOA.
Yes, there are conflicting requirements.
Other requirements are:
- free editing tools need to be available
- the editing format must work well with a revision control system
(textual diffs that do not contain more than was actually changed by the
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest