[rfc-i] Comments on draft-iab-rfcformatreq

Martin Rex mrex at sap.com
Wed Dec 19 23:44:12 PST 2012

John R Levine wrote:
>> The reason to spell out non-ASCII unicode code points is that everyone
>> will call it by the very same name, rather than everyone guessing or
>> trying to describe the shape of the glyph instead, leading to
>> ambiguity and misunderstandings.
> Un huh.  What is the name of this character: #

 "Number Sign", see

> What do you call two dots over a vowel?

I don't call them anything.  They're non-ascii, and can not be
typed on my keyboard, any completely irrelevant to the languages
that I understand.

> Does it matter that I probably call them something else?

If we prohibit their use in I-Ds and RFCs, then it remains
irrelevant for IETF mailing list and WG meeting discussions
how people call them and how rarely that term is understood
by others.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list