[rfc-i] RFC editing tools

Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) jhildebr at cisco.com
Tue Dec 11 17:34:46 PST 2012


On 12/11/12 1:42 PM, "Ted Lemon" <mellon at fugue.com> wrote:

>Which raises the related point that the HTML spec contains a lot of stuff
>that absolutely can't appear in an RFC.   So even if we were to choose
>HTML as a canonical format, what we'd really be choosing would be XML
>with much weaker typing (everything's a classed div) and some tags in
>common with HTML.

Yes.  I've been careful to always say "a well defined subset of HTML" or
the equivalent. It's not that certain tags are prohibited, but instead, a
small subset of widely-interoperable and reasonably-secure tags would be
permitted.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand





More information about the rfc-interest mailing list