[rfc-i] RFC editing tools
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Dec 11 10:27:17 PST 2012
On Dec 11, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Let's phrase it this way: I, too, see the benefit of a format tuned to
>> capture what we want in RFCs (thus xml2rfc++). On the other hand, many
>> people are scared by XML, thus a profile of HTML + metadata conventions (->
>> Joe's proposal).
>> If we can convert between these two, we don't have to decide :-)
> And you and I know that we can convert between them :) Even so there
> is one thing to decide: whether anyone will put resources into
> implementing one or the other.
The RFC Editor should do this by funding software development. If they do not, then things get ugly quickly.
More information about the rfc-interest