On Dec 11, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote: > Well, no, it can: convert to XHTML and you have XML. The problem with > using (X)HTML Another problem with XHTML is that as far as I understand, it's been abandoned in favor of HTML5. Admittedly I'm not an expert in this world, though—did I hear wrong?