[rfc-i] RFC editing tools

[Ted Lemon]

On Dec 9, 2012, at 4:10 PM, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:
> Understood, but in this case, a) it really was simple code, and b) it's
> already been written, so arguing it's hard doesn't make sense.

We're in the business of writing standards, not implementations.   I don't want a canonical format that depends on a special pile of javascript.

Anyway, it's pretty clear from the position you're arguing that there's no chance of us agreeing, so we should probably drop this.