[rfc-i] RFC editing tools

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Sun Dec 9 13:51:52 PST 2012


On Dec 9, 2012, at 4:10 PM, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:
> Understood, but in this case, a) it really was simple code, and b) it's
> already been written, so arguing it's hard doesn't make sense.

We're in the business of writing standards, not implementations.   I don't want a canonical format that depends on a special pile of javascript.

Anyway, it's pretty clear from the position you're arguing that there's no chance of us agreeing, so we should probably drop this.



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list