[rfc-i] RFC editing tools
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Wed Dec 5 22:26:10 PST 2012
On 12/5/12 8:19 PM, "Ted Lemon" <mellon at fugue.com> wrote:
>xml2rfc and nroff are both ascii-only, or at least utf8-only. No binary
>junk or undocumented formats. An alien archaeologist thousands of years
>from now who'd managed to figure out ASCII would have no trouble working
>out what the in-band markup code did.
>We would be right, IMHO, to reject any canonical representation that
>involved a complicated binary data file format, particularly one that
>might be undocumented, poorly documented or reverse-engineered. Such
>formats are not future-proof.
>But I think xml2rfc is just as future-proof as plain ASCII.
As is carefully-crafted HTML. Perhaps even more so, because there will be
a larger corpus for these archaeologists to work from.
More information about the rfc-interest