[rfc-i] Following up from Atlanta

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Tue Dec 4 23:20:32 PST 2012


On 2012/12/05 6:08, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:

> Note, it may be that we could get the publishing process to run lynx (et
> al.) or some equivalent to render a good-enough plain text version, with
> the understanding that it would be missing key features.  In that case,
> "good enough" is important; we might decide that images are replaced by
> [IMAGE DELETED], non-ASCII7 codepoints like Ⅷ are replaced with [U+2167:
> ROMAN NUMERAL EIGHT],

Why that? It would make both examples and names much more difficult to read.

Regards,   Martin.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list