[rfc-i] Pre-qualifying errata [was Re: Errata proposal]

Marc Petit-Huguenin petithug at acm.org
Tue Aug 21 10:35:39 PDT 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08/21/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:20:08AM -0700, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> 
>> Again, the problem I have is to track the errata for each RFC I implement
>> - I have to read them, understand them and decide if they apply to my 
>> implementation or not.  So spurious errata create more work for me.
> 
> so your real problem is that pending errata aren't dealt with quick (or
> rigid) enough?

No, it's that one should discuss with people in the know before filling an errata.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc at petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=1L92
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list